Recent changes to U.S. trade policy—including a sweeping expansion of tariffs on imported goods—are creating new challenges across the tech sector. While these tariffs don’t directly target cybersecurity services, the financial and operational ripple effects are already being felt.
Rising import costs, shifting vendor dynamics, and increased pressure on IT budgets are starting to affect how organizations approach cybersecurity—especially small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs) that operate with leaner resources. For business leaders, IT managers, and security teams alike, this moment calls for careful planning and smart prioritization.
Understanding how broader economic policy translates into cybersecurity risk isn’t just a concern for analysts—it’s a strategic imperative for any organization that depends on digital infrastructure and secure operations.
Tariffs Are Increasing Tech Costs—and Cybersecurity Isn’t Immune
As new tariffs drive up the cost of imported goods—especially technology components like servers, semiconductors, and networking equipment—the price of delivering cybersecurity services is rising too. Even though cybersecurity is often categorized as a “service,” it relies heavily on imported physical infrastructure. Firewalls, intrusion detection systems, endpoint protection hardware, and secure remote access tools all depend on parts now subject to steep price hikes.
In fact, according to Statista, global semiconductor prices have risen by more than 20% since 2022, and further increases are expected as tariff-related supply chain disruptions ripple through the market. For IT teams already struggling with aging infrastructure or deferred upgrades, this adds new layers of complexity.
Why This Matters for Ohio SMBs
Ohio’s 950,000+ small businesses are the backbone of the state’s economy, employing nearly half of the private workforce (U.S. SBA, 2023). Yet most operate with limited cybersecurity maturity and budget constraints that leave them vulnerable. Rising tech costs can tip the balance from “tight but manageable” to “unsustainable.”
Tariffs are forcing some SMBs in Ohio to:
-
Delay necessary cybersecurity upgrades like firewall refreshes, MFA rollouts, or patch management automation
-
Rely on fewer vendors, leading to potential “monoculture” risks where one product dominates
-
Shift focus from proactive security to reactive troubleshooting, increasing downtime and reputational risk
This is particularly concerning in a state where manufacturing, logistics, and healthcare—all high-target industries for cyberattacks—make up large portions of the SMB economy.
“We’re already seeing businesses cut budgets as a direct response to market instability,” said a cybersecurity CEO in a recent interview. “Security often gets deprioritized in tough times, but that’s when you need resilience the most.”
What SMB Leaders Should Be Asking
-
Can we afford to delay planned security upgrades in Q2 or Q3?
-
Are we over-reliant on any single vendor or product?
-
Have we reassessed how tariff-driven costs could affect our risk posture?
Ignoring these questions isn’t just risky—it’s expensive. IBM’s 2023 report found that the average cost of a data breach in the U.S. for businesses with under 500 employees was $2.98 million—a number that few Ohio SMBs could survive.
Monocultures: The Hidden Risk in Vendor Consolidation
When companies limit their options to only the lowest-cost providers (often domestic or regional), it can lead to what's known as cybersecurity monocultures—an environment where a single product dominates due to cost, not capability.
While this might seem efficient, monocultures actually increase systemic risk. A single vulnerability in one widely used tool could impact hundreds or thousands of organizations at once.
-
A 2015 study found that countries dominated by a single antivirus provider were significantly more vulnerable to widespread malware outbreaks.
-
Diverse vendor ecosystems, while sometimes more complex, offer greater security through redundancy and layered defense.
Cybersecurity Is a Business Continuity Issue
The message here is simple: cybersecurity must remain a business priority, even during economic uncertainty.
-
Reassess vendor contracts for opportunities to reduce cost without sacrificing quality.
-
Diversify suppliers when possible, especially for mission-critical security tools.
-
Avoid short-term cuts to cybersecurity programs that could lead to higher recovery costs later.
And perhaps most importantly: understand that adversaries take advantage of instability. Cybercriminals actively target organizations during periods of disruption—when attention and resources are spread thin.
Resilience Over Reaction
At Securafy, we advocate for resilient security postures that adapt to changing economic conditions without compromising protection. The goal isn't to spend more—it’s to spend smarter. That means aligning cybersecurity with overall business continuity planning, supply chain resilience, and executive risk management.
If you're unsure how recent global shifts might impact your security posture, we're here to help.
Join the Conversation